Home|Login|Register  |    
Chairman Franks speaks on Barbour, Pickering probe

JACKSON - Chairman Jamie Franks released the following statement concerning allegations that Gov. Haley Barbour conspired with former Congressman Chip Pickering to circumvent federal campaign finance laws:

"This is a serious allegation, and the facts are pretty clear. It does not take a rocket scientist to see there is no coincidence in what happened. It appears clear that Gov. Barbour tried to hide a campaign donation from Pickering to Louisiana Sen. David Vitter.

"This is nothing new for Barbour or Mississippi Republicans who routinely use shadow PACs, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and innocuous-sounding groups to hide their political money or to attack Democratic candidates so they can look like they are above the fray," Franks said. "However, this is something a bit more serious. What appears to have happened here actually violates federal law and is a serious offense for a governor who not only represents Mississippi but all Republican governors nationwide.

"If Gov. Barbour did nothing wrong, he should simply come forward and say so. He should tell the people of Mississippi that he has not been involved with Pickering in any way when it comes to raising money for Vitter. Short of such a claim, it is hard to believe these accusations are anything but true."

The Louisiana Democratic Party filed a complaint with the Federal Elections Commission this week alleging that Barbour, Pickering and Vitter engaged in an illegal conduit scheme to hide a $5,000 contribution from Pickering to Vitter's campaign.

From the Louisiana Democratic Party:

In August, Barbour’s political action committee, Haley’s PAC, received a $5,000 contribution from Pickering four days after making a contribution in the same amount to David Vitter’s campaign. Louisiana Democrats say there is strong evidence that David Vitter accepted a campaign contribution made in the name of another, a violation of federal law.

The $5,000 transaction was the only activity reported by Haley’s PAC and the Commerce, Hope, Innovation and Progress (CHIP), Pickering’s committee, in August. CHIP PAC has not reported any other transactions for 2009 and Haley’s PAC has made only one.

“When you lay out the facts, it’s clear that it is not simply a coincidence that in a four day period these two dormant PAC’s suddenly passed around an identical amount of money that ultimately ends up in David Vitter’s hands,” said Louisiana Democratic Party Chair Chris Whittington. “Most people who break the law manage to cover their tracks a little better than Vitter, Pickering and Barbour seem to have.”

CQ Politics reported this suspicious serious of transactions between Vitter, Barbour and Pickering last month, noting that “Pickering, like Vitter is a conservative Christian Republican accused of having an extramarital affair linked to the ‘C Street’ townhouse in Southeast Washington that is at the center of a spate of GOP sex scandals.” CQ Politics labeled the suspicious transactions a “$5K ‘C Street Relay.”

Their mutual scandals and their association with the ‘C Street’ group may explain why Vitter and Pickering would want to hide the contribution, Whittington says.

“Clearly, a direct and publicly disclosed contribution from Pickering to Vitter would bring unwanted attention to both scandal-plagued men and to the Republican Party as a whole,” Whittington said.

Miss. Dem Presser

Posted October 8, 2009 - 11:31 am
4 Comments:

Jamie, this should be easy to prosecute.  You have a precedent.  Judge-briber attorneys Langston and Scruggs sent about $400K to the Democrat Attorney General Association and then the DAGA turned around and gave it to Jim Hood.  Just take the ruling from the conviction in that case and use it against Haley.  Oh, wait, nothing was ever charged in that case. Hmmmm, can’t use that.  So, just recycle the indignant press release the Democrat Party put out about it.  Ooops again.  There was none.  OK, I have it now.  Langston and Scruggs had pure motives and only wanted truth and justice.  Haley and Chip wanted to buy a Louisiana Senator.  There, that ought to work.

Posted by rubradog on 10-08-2009 at 06:04 PM [link]

This is coming from the man that he couldn’t even carry his home county and his local liberal newspaper would not even endorse his candidacy for governor lite.  Folks around here that know jamie franks well know that his politics have rarely ever been above board and now he’s calling out someone else.  God help the po boy.

Posted by CDavidS on 10-08-2009 at 06:53 PM [link]

I’m doubting Haley Barbour would risk all he’s built for $5,000 to help out somebody else.  I don’t know election law to this level of precision.

If they can prove something, they should prove it.  But right now, it looks like the “Kevin Bacon game” of political contributions.  Which is to say nothing.  All though it sure sounds interesting if you don’t think very hard.

Posted by Howard Roark on 10-09-2009 at 07:23 AM [link]

This just adds to the premesis of the double standard....If you are a Democrat you can lie, cheat, bribe(see steal) and nothing happens(unless you cheat another Democrat) but if you are a Republican all hell breaks loose over implied infractions. And since we have no unbiased newspapers, it is getting worse!  Disgraceful!  Only good news is the Trial Lawyers(Democratic) lobbying group is multi-millions in debt.

Posted by catty on 10-09-2009 at 08:49 AM [link]
You must be registered and logged in to post a comment. And yes, you can still keep your identity anonymous. See the instructions on the registration page.



recent comments

©2005-2010 Jackson New Media, Inc. All rights reserved.