Home|Login|Register  |    
Hood Surfaces . . . But Only For Long Enough to Pile on Balducci
Through A Spokesman, Of Course
By Alan Lange
Mississippi Attorney General Jim Hood finally surfaced today from a full week in hiding after several of his largest campaign contributors and one of his Special Assistant Attorneys General, Tim Balducci, were indicted on charges related to bribing a state court judge.

Today, in an AP story, Hood surfaced through a spokesperson to do his top campaign contributor and "confidential informant's" bidding . . . trash Timothy Balducci.

From the story . . .
Hood has also worked with Balducci in the past. He hired Langston's firm to represent the state in collecting $100 million in back taxes from telecom giant MCI. Langston and Balducci were paid $14 million as part of the MCI settlement in May 2005.

Hood tried to distance himself from Balducci.

"Our contracts have been with the Langston Law Firm, not directly with Timothy Balducci," Hood said through a spokeswoman. "His only involvement with our office is in whatever tasks he was assigned by his employer."


However, there is a truckload of evidence that said that Hood's connections to Balducci were directly engaging in nature and that Balducci and Langston were law partners instead of employee/employer as Hood and Scruggs are desperately trying to spin through surrogates in the media.

According to the retention agreement in the MCI case listed on Langston's own website, Hood retained the Langston Law Firm, but appointed Joey Langston and Tim Balducci individually as Special Assistant Attorneys General.


The Office of the Attorney General hereby retains the Langston Law Firm ("Law Firm") and its principal members, Joseph C. Langston and Timothy R. Balducci, are hereby designated as Special Assistant Attorneys General to investigate, research, and file the Claims in anyt appropriate Court or Courts or before any appropriate governmental agency.


In the Zyprexa drug case filed by Hood, Balducci's. name. comes. up. a lot. in the context of being a Special Assistant Attorney General.

As a purely morbid sidenote, I'll give you one guess as to the court jurisidction that the Zyprexa suit was filed. You got it! Lafayette County, Mississippi - the same jurisdiction as Jones v. Scruggs. Could it be a "magic jurisdiction", perhaps?

All of the "wannabe" talk that Scruggs surrogates and General Hood are trying to spin on Balducci runs directly counter to even Langston's own advertising. In a paid advertorial in Superlawyers, Langston represents Balducci as a "long term partner".

Presently, The Langston Law Firm, anchored by longterm partners Langston and Tim Balducci, practice in the areas of class actions, mass torts, securities litigation, product liability, serious personal injury and selective medical malpractice.


The bottom line is that there is a long LONG trail that tie Tim Balducci, Joey Langston, Dickie Scruggs, Mike Moore and Jim Hood through prior legal partnerships, campaign contributions, and work awarded and any attempt to deconstruct those relationships will be politically and logistically difficult. Count on the fact that everyone on the Scruggs team (and now apparently Jim Hood) will continue to throw Balducci under the bus. They may be successful, in part, but I am betting that Balducci drags at least a couple of the aforementioned under the bus with him.

Posted December 10, 2007 - 7:48 pm
15 Comments:

So what’s Hood going to say should Langston receive an indictment as well?  “Our contracts were with a law firm based in Booneville, not directly with Joey Langston or Timothy Balducci.” What the *&$#%@%!!

Both were represented publicly as members in the Langston law firm at the time of the AG’s contract.  Hood is ridiculous.

Posted by Reagan Dem on 12-11-2007 at 07:23 AM [link]

I can only presume Hood made these comments before Langston’s office got raided by the Feds.  WHAT HAPPENS IF Langston is indicted?  Then where does Hood go?

Posted by Alan on 12-11-2007 at 09:04 AM [link]

Brazil, probably.

Posted by Reagan Dem on 12-11-2007 at 09:14 AM [link]

Good one, RD.

AND IF (BIG IF) Langston is indicted, Hood will have an impossible time of spinning the “innocent till proven guilty” line given his treatment of State Farm.

Posted by Alan on 12-11-2007 at 09:21 AM [link]

Yall notice that Hood/AG website has changed…
http://www.ago.state.ms.us/index.php Focus is now families, consumers, seniors, victims....

“State Farm-Latest News Regarding the State Farm Class Action Lawsuit” ....page is blank…

http://www.ago.state.ms.us/index.php/
pages/state_farm/

Do search for “MCI” or “WorldCom"--search gives no results....

Posted by Just Me on 12-11-2007 at 11:31 AM [link]

This may be a stupid question...but what are the chances Hood will serve any time?  Or is that stretching it a little far (for right now anyway)?

Posted by ccvz on 12-11-2007 at 01:40 PM [link]

I think that’s stretching WAY WAY far.

Posted by Alan on 12-11-2007 at 02:16 PM [link]

Has anyone been able to get to the AG’s web site lately? I can get to the House, the Governor, but not the AG.

Posted by Jean on 12-11-2007 at 03:07 PM [link]

I can get there now.

Posted by Jean on 12-11-2007 at 03:41 PM [link]

Alan,

Can you really be serious when you say things like, “given Hood’s treatment of State Farm?” That’s the same State Farm that made billions in profits in the same year when thousands lost their homes and were denied their insurance claims after Katrina.

You seem to be implying that Hood has unfairly targeted State Farm?  Have you looked at any of the evidence showing wrongdoing on the part of State Farm?
Check out Gene Taylor’s web site on “Documents That Suggest Fraud by Insurance Companies in the Handling of Katrina Wind and Water Claims” http://www.house.gov/genetaylor/OIHearing.Docs.htm

Remember what has been at stake here. It’s not just the rich and politically famous who are affected, but all homeowners. Are you
sure you are choosing the right side of that battle?  All people that pay their premiums are affected. Alan, can you be taken seriously now that you’ve showed who you are sympathetic to?

Posted by insurjustice on 12-11-2007 at 07:49 PM [link]

If State Farm or any company does bad, they should get their just desserts through civil recourse.  But to have a seemingly coordinated criminal shakedown to support a civil one is pretty reprehensible in my book.

As I have said before, the people who are hurt the most by all this foolishness are little guys who need the help of regular trial lawyers (not the jet setters) to right legitimate wrongs.

Posted by Alan on 12-11-2007 at 08:00 PM [link]

Did Donna Ladd slip in here?

An insurance policy is your property. You own it. We do not buy a home or car or even a pair of shoes without grilling the salesman. We should not treat our insurance policies any differently.

Yes it is the agent’s responsibility to make sure you know all you need to know about a policy before you apply and before you sign it. After that it is up to you to take care of your property.

Bottom line here is read your policy. If you do not understand it, schedule an appointment with you agent to review it.

Posted by Gravitas on 12-11-2007 at 08:13 PM [link]

To further your comment RSR, an insurance policy, be it on your home, your car, your life, your business, your personal property, is a contractual document…

An insurance company will contractually insure a burning building, as long as the premiums are set based on the circumstances at the origination of the contract.

Posted by Reagan Dem on 12-11-2007 at 09:00 PM [link]

You never know what coverage you have until you make a claim.

Posted by curly on 12-11-2007 at 10:27 PM [link]
Posted by MSlawyer on 12-12-2007 at 05:31 AM [link]
You must be registered and logged in to post a comment. And yes, you can still keep your identity anonymous. See the instructions on the registration page.
recent comments

©2005-2010 Jackson New Media, Inc. All rights reserved.