Home|Login|Register  |    
Blogging attorneys dissect Miss. Zyprexa decision: "Pigs Get Fat, Mississippi Got Slaughtered"

Mississippi Attorney General Jim Hood's Zyprexa lawsuit "got slaughtered" by a federal judge, two leading legal bloggers recently wrote.

James Beck and Mark Herrmann analyzed a recent 117-page order by U.S. District Judge Jack Weinstein that granted Eli Lilly & Co. summary judgment on all but one of Mississippi's claims on their blog "Drug and Device Law."

On Dec. 1, Weinstein called the lawsuit, filed by Hood's office through private attorneys, "a slash-and-burn style of litigation."

The title of the blog's entry is "Pigs Get Fat, Mississippi Got Slaughtered."

"The Court's decision was, at times, visibly reluctant," the entry says.

"It concluded that the claims brought by Mississippi couldn't be adjudicated on a mass basis and - since the state was unable or unwilling to prove them one-by-one - there was no evidence on critical causation, reliance, and injury points, which required entry of summary judgment."

Eli Lilly is alleged to have promoted Zyprexa for off-label uses. The drug also allegedly caused weight gain-related side effects like diabetes.

Twelve states didn't participate in a 33-state, $62-million settlement last year. Of those 12, six have reached eight-figure settlements while six are still holding out.

Three of those states -- Arkansas, Pennsylvania and Mississippi -- are represented by Bailey Perrin Bailey of Houston.

The entry makes a note of Mississippi's inability to settle. Weinstein had pushed for a mass settlement, appointing a special settlement master and even ordering the states to take 30 days off from their suits to try to reach an agreement last year.

"Mississippi was - again unable or unwilling - to come to such a settlement, so its claims, which were legally meritless in any event, come to naught," the entry says.

"The court firmly rejected the notion of multiplied statutory penalties, and stated, in dictum, that such penalties were probably unconstitutional as 'excessive fines.'

John O'Brien
Legal News Line
12/9/9

Posted December 9, 2009 - 2:50 pm
4 Comments:

Dec. 1.  Anybody else notice that?  Wonder why Conway didn’t include this little ditty in his presser on catching the wayward pirates of the internet?  Maybe because the pay to play didn’t pay this time around.....

Posted by factord_agin on 12-09-2009 at 05:49 PM [link]

If he had simply settled like most states, Mississippi would be getting several millions. But the gamble for big money by the Texas firm and campaign supporters he gave the contract to, ended up crapping out.

Posted by josepacheco on 12-09-2009 at 09:26 PM [link]

Has this made the Clarion Ledger yet?  Are we still waiting?

Posted by reddneck on 12-09-2009 at 11:24 PM [link]

No, they are using all their investigative talents to pursue a story on a former elected official and a soccer game.

Posted by josepacheco on 12-10-2009 at 08:02 AM [link]
You must be registered and logged in to post a comment. And yes, you can still keep your identity anonymous. See the instructions on the registration page.



recent comments

©2005-2010 Jackson New Media, Inc. All rights reserved.