|
|
recent comments
Friday at 11:43 am
State Treasurer Tate Reeves' recent appearance on CNBC talkin' bonds Alan: Fixed. Shaunessy Smith: Feelin? Good, Thinkin? BigWhere?s the beef? Alabama?s Nick Saban has a valid pointDr. Do-it-all?.James AndrewsPolk, Palmeiro to join Clark in Hall of Fame Democrats hold the House seat created by Rep. Charles Young's deathLow and behold, "taxing the sick" was agreeable all the way around...Harper, Taylor and Childers reject ‘climate’ bill — Thompson votes for it2009 Neshoba County Fair Political Speaking Schedule The National RepublicansAndy & the Budget (part whatever)A new fiscal year dawnsThank goodness for New York and Minnesota So long farewell, auf weidersehen good-byeBarbour in EuropeThe tobacco tax that couldGovernor Bryant? More on Goldman SachsBond deal dead, new one possibleHow Goldman created the oil bubble.Another business leaves |
|
©2005-2009 Jackson New Media, Inc. All rights reserved.
|
Hmmm, the Air Force goes with the tanker that they feel suits their needs best. Boeing wants them to buy their tanker regardless of what the airmen need. Boeing knew what Northrup Grumman was coming up with, a bigger tanker than theirs that would be more versatile; so why didn’t they develop a bigger tanker themselves instead of just putting a gas pump on the back of an existing airframe? This is just like making your soldiers use an inferior rifle to make some corporation happy, or the bureau of ordnance happy, which is what has happened time and time again in our military. Just ask the submariners in WWII about the early torpedoes that would not explode on direct or magnetic contact with an enemy ship.