Home|Login|Register  |    
National Party Kibitzing Grows in Mississippi Special House Race

The effort by Davis and his Republican backers to push past Childers in the runoff are based on their attempts to “nationalize” the race. They are seeking to erode Childers’ claims of conservative credentials by associating him with more liberal national Democratic Party leaders — a tack being echoed in the Louisiana House special election contest between state Rep. Don Cazayoux, who also is running as a conservative-leaning Democrat, and Republican former state Rep. Woody Jenkins.

Davis, who is running on his own conservative agenda and his record as mayor, launched an ad this week that sought to characterize Childers as a liberal by connecting him to Illinois Sen. Barack Obama , the Democratic presidential contender. The ad portrayed Childers as remaining silent during the controversy over inflammatory remarks made by Rev. Jeremiah Wright, the longtime pastor of the Chicago church attended by Obama, and also when Obama suggested prior to the April 22 Pennsylvania primary that working-class voters who are “bitter” over economic conditions “cling” to religion and guns.

Davis implied that Obama had endorsed Childers’ campaign, and said that compelled Childers to comment on these controversies. Republicans note that Obama’s campaign Web site posted a notice asking supporters to make calls to boost support for Childers.

But Childers denied Obama had formally endorsed his campaign, and noted in a response ad that Obama is an individual “I don’t know and have never met.”

Childers also contended in a separate statement that Davis was running the ad to “distract” voters from his own campaign challenges. “This race is not about a senator from Illinois or a pastor from Chicago,” Childers said in a statement. “It’s about the people of Mississippi. It’s about right and wrong. And the way Greg Davis is running his campaign is wrong.”

National Party Kibitzing Grows in Mississippi Special House Race
Analysts have said it is possible that a kind word from Obama — who is seeking to become the nation’s first African-American president — could help Childers at the polls May 13 by increasing turnout among blacks who make up more than a quarter of district voters and typically vote overwhelmingly Democratic. But Childers, who is casting himself as a “pro-life” and “pro-gun” conservative, has to walk a fine line in a district that overall leans strongly to the right, as Republicans are basing their campaign against him on an allusion that he will side with liberal Democrats should he go to Washington.

The May 13 runoff is the fourth 1st District election this year. The candidates weathered a March 11 primary and the April 1 primary runoff in which Childers and Davis each won their party’s nomination to compete in the November general election for a full term in the upcoming 111th Congress. The candidates met again on April 22 to compete in the special election to fill the remainder of Wicker’s unexpired term, which ends in January, and will complete the circuit with the May 13 special election runoff.

The May 13 winner will be sworn into Congress shortly after his win and will be able to boast of his experience in office when the general election campaign rolls around this fall.

Analysts have said it is possible that a kind word from Obama — who is seeking to become the nation’s first African-American president — could help Childers at the polls May 13 by increasing turnout among blacks who make up more than a quarter of district voters and typically vote overwhelmingly Democratic. But Childers, who is casting himself as a “pro-life” and “pro-gun” conservative, has to walk a fine line in a district that overall leans strongly to the right, as Republicans are basing their campaign against him on an allusion that he will side with liberal Democrats should he go to Washington.

CQ
5/2/8

Hattip Cottonmouth

Posted May 2, 2008 - 2:14 pm
19 Comments:

Childers’ argument seems to be that Davis is a mean guy.

Davis’ argument seems to be that Childers will vote with Pelosi, Obama, etc, and is not at all conservative.

From the article . . .

But Childers, who is casting himself as a “pro-life” and “pro-gun” conservative, has to walk a fine line in a district that overall leans strongly to the right, as Republicans are basing their campaign against him on an allusion that he will side with liberal Democrats should he go to Washington.

I don’t think it’s an allusion . . . Davis is saying exactly that.  So far, Childers has been unable to disavow himself of his support of and from Obama, Kerry ($2000 check) , Pelosi (who definitely holds sway over the $1M of DCCC money Childers has gotten), etc.  He WILL vote for Pelosi for Speaker if elected, but he cannot say that in public. 

Maybe Greg Davis needs to challenge Childers to sign a pledge to vote for a Republican speaker of the House.  For a “conservative” like Childers, that shouldn’t be a problem . . . should it?

Posted by Alan on 05-02-2008 at 03:21 PM [link]

The national dimmies have put way too much money into his campaign for Davis to say he won’t be indebted to them.  He’d be lying is he were to say he’s distanced himself from them.  In actual fact, he’s more endeared to them today than he was yesterday and it grows everyday he lets them run ads here in Mississippi.

Now the same can be said about Davis’ connection to the GOP.  However, I don’t think that’s all bad.

Posted by CDavidS on 05-02-2008 at 04:33 PM [link]

you mean CHILDERS will be indebted to them (National Dems).

Posted by HernandoMan on 05-02-2008 at 04:48 PM [link]

I think we ought to ask him.  Like you said, if he’s so conservative, he won’t mind.  Don’t hold your breath.

Posted by Howard Roark on 05-02-2008 at 06:42 PM [link]

"Allusion”?????  Travis gave money to Kerry, a liberal.  Travis got endorsed by Obama, liberal.  Travis is getting funded by Pelosi, liberal.  It’s not an “allusion” that he will side “with liberal Democrats if he goes to Washington” its the fact, reality, and truth.  But it is not an allusion!

Posted by FairMan on 05-02-2008 at 07:09 PM [link]

just got a call from GW saying vote for Davis.  Wonder if Obama, Hillary, or Bill will be calling for CHilders?

Posted by DesotoDad on 05-02-2008 at 07:49 PM [link]

DD. I bet you Obama, Hillary and Bill has higher approval ratings than GW. I think I read yesterday that GW has the lowest in history.

Boy I tell you that Da.vis Campaign will go down in history as “just stupid”

Posted by ElPabloPolitico on 05-02-2008 at 08:35 PM [link]

Pablo, they don’t in this district.  As for the “just stupid” comment, I’ll remember you said that.

Posted by Howard Roark on 05-02-2008 at 08:36 PM [link]

epp, your dem controlled congress has an even lower rating.

Posted by DesotoDad on 05-02-2008 at 08:38 PM [link]

whats your prediction for 5/13, el pablo el langston?

Posted by HernandoMan on 05-02-2008 at 08:46 PM [link]

Remember it my friend, remember it.

My prediction is a spread of 1500 to 2000 votes at least in favor of Childers.

Hman go out and ask people on the street about GW. You must think that what is said on here is the will of the people. 5 or 6 neo-cons dont represent the will of the people. I think I remember yall saying that Davis would stomp Childers the last time but wasnt it Childers that almost beat him in the first? I thought even yall would have sense to realize that “Cash Is King” and Childers has more. Yall better pray that Davis can pull one out of his rear end because yall know the RNC will not be able to afford to play in November.

Posted by ElPabloPolitico on 05-02-2008 at 09:12 PM [link]

Pablo, had Childers not got the Obama endorsement, I would agree with you. However, that my friend will go down as making Childers the “just stupid” campaign.  It has cost Travis.  He can’t get away from Obamatross.  Then on top of it, Rev. Wright went nuts again at the perfect time.  Obama endorsement has damaged Childers with a lot of voters he had last time.  Your prediction won’t happen and Davis will win.

Posted by FairMan on 05-03-2008 at 05:31 AM [link]

Childers definitely has more money and it’s nice for you to admit that, Paul.  But in competitive races the one with the most money doesn’t necessarily win. 

I hope you really believe what you wrote about that 1500-2000 vote spread.  I honestly hope you really, really believe that.

Posted by Howard Roark on 05-03-2008 at 05:49 AM [link]

actually Davis has more $$$ on hand and looks to raise much more this week. The National Dem’s have put more in than the GOP, however.  But Davis still has more $$$.

SOUTHAVEN - White House officials confirmed Friday that U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney will make a campaign stop on behalf of 1st U.S. Congressional candidate Greg Davis May 12, the eve of the run-off election with Democrat Travis Childers.

“We can confirm the vice president will be attending a get out the vote rally for Greg Davis,” Jamie Breland, spokesperson in the White House Press Office of Vice President Dick Cheney, said Friday.

Tentative arrangements call for Cheney to appear with Davis in an afternoon rally at the DeSoto Civic Center in Southaven. Republican strategist Karl Rove will also appear with Davis in a separate event prior to the election.

Posted by HernandoMan on 05-03-2008 at 07:23 AM [link]

Please keep us updated on the Cheney meeting.  There should be more about it this next week end at the Republican State Convention and I’ll also pass along what I hear down there.

Posted by CDavidS on 05-03-2008 at 11:27 AM [link]

Wow. Cheney? Boys I know this is Mississippi but Cheney is a stupid move. Just Stupid. As far as my prediction, keep your blinders on my friends. I remember on the election day thread some of you were predicting 55% for Davis. But as I recall Childers come within 410 votes of whoopin his ass the 1st time.

Posted by ElPabloPolitico on 05-03-2008 at 12:35 PM [link]

cheney is the freaking VICE PRESIDENT of the UNITED STATES.  you may hate that fact el pablo el liberal. but it is a fact.  cheney STILL has strong favorables among the GOP faithful. 

but you and travis just keep shaking in your boots and running from your own party.

(by the way...how will travis childers spin and lie his way out of the $$$$$ he just recieved from NANCY PELOSI and STENY HOYER and the LIBERAL Democratic leadership.  oh, and his latest FEC filing was reported LATE.

HOYER FOR CONGRESS COMMITTEE BOWIE MD 20716 04/23/2008 $2,000
NANCY PELOSI FOR CONGRESS SAN FRANCISCO CA 94104 04/21/2008 $2,000
NANCY PELOSI FOR CONGRESS SAN FRANCISCO CA 94104 04/21/2008 $2,000
PAC TO THE FUTURE SAN FRANCISCO CA 94104 04/21/2008 $5,000
NANCY PELOSI FOR CONGRESS SAN FRANCISCO CA 94104 04/21/2008 $2,000
DEBBIE WASSERMAN SHULTZ FOR CONGRESS WESTON FL 33326 04/17/2008 $2,000
JOHN D. DINGELL FOR CONGRESS COMMITTEE WASHINGTON DC 20005 04/21/2008 $1,000

tell me agian who travis childers WILL BE beholden to?

Posted by HernandoMan on 05-03-2008 at 02:28 PM [link]

We might set it up that while Cheney is down here he takes Pablo hunting. Just kidding Pablo, I wish you no harm. Cheney’s visit will be great for Davis.  The rally in Desoto Co should bump turnout.  Add that on to all the votes that Travis has lost across the district since Obama endorsement, and Davis has the advantage.

People are FINALLY realizing who Travis will owe in DC with his donors.  HM is right, Travis will be beholden to these liberals.  It has taken a while, but the tide is finally shifting Davis’ way.

The bottom line is Davis can bring in National leadership of his party to our district.  Childers cannot.  Childers has to lie about their endorsements because they are out of touch with North MS.  If Travis was REALLY concerned about pro-life, pro-gun issues, then why would he belong to a party that has done and continues to be for abortion and for taking away our 2nd amendment rights.  People are now realizing that these so called “conservative democrats” that got elected in 2006, are the liberals that put Pelosi in power.  Travis has now taken her money.  She owns him.

Posted by FairMan on 05-03-2008 at 04:41 PM [link]

Does anyone actually recall the debate between Cheney and Leiberman?  It was like watching MME between a Navy Seal and Woody Allen.

Anyone that doesn’t respect Cheney’s intelligence, seriously has problems other than just towing the Dem’s line.  i would vote for Cheney for President Dem-style, meaning six or seven times.

Posted by Two Dogs on 05-03-2008 at 08:09 PM [link]
You must be registered and logged in to post a comment. And yes, you can still keep your identity anonymous. See the instructions on the registration page.
recent comments


©2005-2008 Jackson New Media, Inc. All rights reserved.