Renfroes move for summary judgment, dismissal of qui tam suit

In a five-page motion supported by a nineteen-page memorandum of law, Gene and Jana Renfroe argue that

For all of the reasons set forth fully in the Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment Under 31 U.S.C. § 3730(e)(4) that E. A. Renfroe & Company, Inc., Gene Renfroe, and Jana Renfroe have filed in support of this Motion, the Relators’ claims fall within the category of claims prohibited under 31 U.S.C. § 3730(e)(4), this Court lacks jurisdiction over Counts I through IV of the First Amended Complaint, and these claims must be dismissed with prejudice.