Well, Jim Hood- the man who has nothing to say about his good buddy Dickie Scruggs getting indicted- issued an opinion saying the election needs to be held sometime around March, or else!
. . .
Jim Hood is well on his way to making himself irrelevant. He issued a pointless opinion saying Barbour should disclose his blind trust when the Ethics Commission- headed by Hood’s brother- said it was perfectly legal. He exists to do or say the complete opposite of what Barbour says. The fact that he can speak up about something as minor as an election date, but doesn’t say a word about his trial lawyer donors being indicted speaks volumes for the man that he is. Is a lawyer bribing a judge not repugnant as Hood declares delaying the election is?
Majority in MS