From the Award Winning Y’all Politics Memory division, here’s a smattering of media coverage of the incident shortly before the election

http://www.cnn.com/2016/11/02/us/mississippi-black-church-vandalized-vote-trump/

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/acts-of-faith/wp/2016/11/02/vote-trump-painted-on-wall-of-burned-out-black-church-in-mississippi/?utm_term=.de6091a3db30

http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/11/a-black-church-burned-in-the-name-of-trump/506246/

http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/11/03/500496061/fbi-investigating-burning-of-black-church-painted-with-vote-trump

Now, we in fact know that there’s been an arrest of a church member in that crime and that it looks less and less like it was a hate crime or racially driven.

Will the national media who seemed hell bent on making the media narrative an indictment of Donald Trump’s wreckless language that inspired the incident (which was investigated as a hate crime) clean up the record to reflect that it was someone who just wanted the incident to look that way?